ASReview vs Rayyan
A side-by-side comparison of ASReview and Rayyan — pricing, license, deployment, and where each tool wins.
ASReview
asreview.nl
Open-source AI-powered tool for systematic reviews, helping researchers screen large volumes of academic literature efficiently.
Rayyan
rayyan.ai
An AI-powered platform for managing systematic literature reviews with collaborative screening and data management tools.
| Feature | ASReview | Rayyan |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free | Freemium |
| Model | Open-source | Freemium |
| License | open-source | Proprietary |
| Deployment | Cloud, Self-hosted | Cloud |
| Category | Text & Writing | Text & Writing |
| Self-hosted | ✓Yes | ✕No |
| Free tier | ✓Yes | ✓Yes |
Pick ASReview if…
- ✓You want full source-code access and no per-seat fees.
- ✓You need to self-host for compliance, privacy, or cost.
- ✓Broader tag coverage in our catalog (proxy for feature breadth).
Pick Rayyan if…
- ✓You prefer Rayyan's feature set or ecosystem fit.
2–8hlow risk
Light lift — 2-8 engineering hours for a small team.
Export from ASReview: Markdown, HTML, DOCX
3 things to watch
- ⚠Preserve heading structure
- ⚠Re-link internal references manually
- ⚠Loss of data sovereignty — review your privacy policy
6–20hmedium risk
Plan a sprint — 6-20 engineering hours, run in parallel for a week.
Export from Rayyan: Markdown, HTML, DOCX
4 things to watch
- ⚠Preserve heading structure
- ⚠Re-link internal references manually
- ⚠Set up hosting, TLS, backups before cutover
- ⚠No vendor support — community forums & Discord